Nursing Articles

Nursing > hernia mesh > Current Opinions About Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair - A Survey of Practicing Surgeons

Current Opinions About Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair - A Survey of Practicing Surgeons

Background—

 

Incisional hernias are common. The optimal repair is one of the most analyzed and

Methods—

(www.surveymonkey.com) to assess practices and opinions regarding incisional hernia repair.An IRB approved protocol was designed using an internet-based survey site

Results—

hospital. 85–96% performed basic laparoscopic procedures. The median percentage of laparoscopic

to total hernia repair was <10%. Use of the laparoscopic technique was associated with a higher

volume of hernia repair (r

(z

(z

hernia repair, 81% indicated “no”. In that group, 52% indicated that a lack of improved results was

the main reason, followed by risk of enterotomy > operative time > cost > experience. Those who

would start indicated that the main reason was patient request (54%). Among those that use the

laparoscopic technique, 85% indicated that they would perform more. The main reason for this was

a lower recurrence rate (42%).Of 766 surgeons, 204 (27%) responded. Most respondents practice in an academic, urbanSpearman’s=0.315, p=0.001), concurrent advanced laparoscopic experienceWilcoxon rank sum=−2.348, p=0.019) and completion of a laparoscopic fellowshipWilcoxon rank sum=−3.317, p=0.001). When asked how many would start to perform laparoscopic

Conclusions—

of incisional hernias. Surgeons with experience with advanced laparoscopic techniques, laparoscopic

fellowship training, and higher volume of hernia repair are more likely to use a laparoscopic approach.There continues to be a lack of consensus on the most appropriate repair method

debated topics. There is no consensus as to the appropriate surgical technique.

A link to this page will be included with your message.

E-mail addresses supplied to this service will be used only to send the requested link.

This question helps prevent spam: